Outfitter 

So um... what happened to native FuBar Support? Had it in the last version, and then it went away seemingly in this one.

:/

Meh, I like FuBar fine. Honestly whoever wrote LDB didn't write it for the layman (when I actually got curious about LDB- since it seemed to be the latest thing, it took me forever interrogating WoWI, Curse, and WoWUI just to try to find the core addon :P). I like options, mind you, but I'm no coder- and options I can't comprehend may as well not be options at all. Back to OutfitterFu then. I'd have added that it could have used some hook to call Outfitter similar to what the FuBar module is, but you seem rather upset with it all already and it seems a moot point in any case.

Thanks for answering the question though. No need to get cranky. I just prefer speaking to people rather than release notes (who, incidentally, aren't people).

The removal seemed rather sudden. So did the inclusion, for that matter.

Nothing at all. I choose whether to ask. You choose whether (and how) to answer.

If answering questions from people phrased in this fashion is such a tremendous grief to you, then don't answer. I can't be responsible for the personal grief you feel at poor decision making. If you're right, and the release notes would have leapt up to answer all my ~ahem~ question, then there'd be no need to answer in the first place- and I'd have found my answer eventually, wouldn't I?

Yes, I didn't read them. Perhaps one of the few times I've failed to. I asked a conversational question and what I get in return is a load of self-righteous soapbox twaddle. What's more, it's a first from you in all the time I've been following and asking questions about your project- at least a year.

Are you having a bad day perhaps? Well then, I offer you my most stringent assurance that I had no part in it.


As for the rest, well, if you don't want to support FuBar, don't. But I use it, and Outfitter, and I'm certain I'm far from the only one. I get the impression that this "miraculous" LDB somehow is inter-compatible with FuBar but I've yet to see any benefit out of it. So I guess if it breaks I'll eventually be calling it from the character pane, and at that point, maybe switch to other gear-swapping mods that can be "bothered" to support FuBar.

As you strenuously pointed out this isn't an inconvenience to you either, you don't get paid, after all. Then again, it's not my intention to provide you with inconvenience- it's my intention to provide myself with convenience (why mod your interface if it's not to make it easier to operate?). Nothing more.

So if none of this makes a bit of difference to you, what's with the attitude?

Long time reader, first time poster here.

The attitude started with your original post:

Here's your original post, fixed up to be a polite question:

This version removes the snarky "So um... " and the annoyed ":/" emote, which suggest the author did something wrong. It retains the original message, which is that you fail at reading the patch notes of the release causing your issue.

Both of you can move on now.

I should win an academy award for that attitude. Best attitude I've ever seen, like, anywhere.*


*The above is an attitude, boys and girls.+

+the above is definately an attitude.


No, I think that actually sounds "snarkier". Here's why:

While adding "was this intentional?" which implies that the author intentionally did something wrong. Pure genius.

But then what am I to expect from a topsy-turvy world where up is down and down is up?


I've got a better plan: how about we stop splitting hairs? Cause I could do this all day. Moreover, I'm better at it.

Ok, so fair enough on the removal of native FuBar support.

However, if I do want to use LDB in order to provide access via Fubar, how would I go about that? Is it as simple as just installing LDB or is there something else I need to install/configure? I read the LDB stuff and even as an addon author (admittedly, I haven't written anything complex), it went over my head.

I'm not sure if I've found a bug or just run into some limitation of functionality.
I'm a druid, and I naturally have a set of gear for dps and a set of gear for tanking. About the only thing that is common between these two sets is the tabard that I'm wearing. But when I change out of a form I want that gear to remain on me. So in other words when I shift to bear form, I want my tanking gear to be swapped in, but when I shift back to normal/caster form, I want that gear to remain on me. Similarly, I'd like that to happen with cat form as well, so when I shift to cat form, my dps gear is swapped in, and when I go back to caster form I want that gear to remain on me.

I thought that I had gotten this to work, what I did was remove all the check marks for all the items (except the tabard) from the Normal and Druid: Caster Form outfits. I tested it and it was working as expected, however later (perhaps after a reload) it stopped working. Now when I unshift I get my Bear Form gear. I've tried blowing away my preferences several times and when I do that and start from scratch is when I get the behavior I'm looking for.

Any thoughts? If you need some more detailed/technical info let me know I'd be happy to supply it.

Any way to make the Outfit bar act more like the ItemRack bar does? That is, being able to choose which items to show there? Also, any chance for Buttonfacade support?

Thanks - appreciate your response. For the bar, I just want to add my two weapons, feet, and two trinkets - not necessarily outfits. Seems that these type of features is not what your bar is meant for.