Thread Tools Display Modes
01-12-07, 09:33 AM   #1
NLO
A Fallenroot Satyr
 
NLO's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
MH2 or 3?

I'm using the default Blizz frames and thus, since I'm using MobHealth3, I also need to have MobHealth3 BlizzFrames installed.
Now - Does MH3 really use a lot less memory than MH2? Since I'd rather only have one mod - MobHealth2, which supports the default Blizzard frames without having to have another plugin.
Thx
  Reply With Quote
01-12-07, 09:36 AM   #2
Thrae
A Cyclonian
 
Thrae's Avatar
AddOn Author - Click to view addons
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 42
The Ace2 development community encourages modularized development, which indeed saves memory, allowing you to completely remove external modules that you do not need. Almost always if a feature is added that can be turned on and off in the average mod, that feature will take up some amount of extra memory even when turned off -- even if it's just the functions associated with the new code (function declarations take up memory too).
__________________
Yes, I was a Tauren. Yes, it was bigger.
  Reply With Quote
01-12-07, 06:16 PM   #3
NLO
A Fallenroot Satyr
 
NLO's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 25
...um...
So you're saying MH3+BlizzF instead of MH2?
  Reply With Quote
01-12-07, 06:43 PM   #4
Ricowan
A Deviate Faerie Dragon
 
Ricowan's Avatar
AddOn Author - Click to view addons
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 19
If you're using a few other ACE addons then yes, MH3_BlizzFrames will save you memory. Otherwise, you gain nothing from the shared libraries because nothing else is sharing them.
  Reply With Quote

WoWInterface » AddOns, Compilations, Macros » AddOn Search/Requests » MH2 or 3?


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off