WoWInterface - Author UIs

WoWInterface (https://www.wowinterface.com/forums/index.php)

- UI Screenshots, Feedback and Design Discussion (https://www.wowinterface.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=144)

- - Author UIs (https://www.wowinterface.com/forums/showthread.php?t=51523)

My apologies. It was StUF, not SUF that I was setting up. DOH! I always get those two mixed up. :o

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tonyleila (Post 307597)

PitBull has always been TOO highly configurable for me - when I last looked into it it was PitBull 3 and had to watch youtube guids to understand how to set it up. Are you shure you are talking about SUF with reload? Or Stuf?

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10leej (Post 307600)

It's much simpler nowadays. however still complex if you don't know what your looking at.

I like SUF, but it like the others can be too complicated and I find myself wasting time. Someday, I will sit down and focus on learning oUF and being better with LUA. Right now, I am trying different oUF layouts.

i change my UI alot of times, but this is what im working on right now, the UI changed color on mainbars and minimap.

Example; Combat=Red, Idle=Yellow, Stealth=Blue.

its still in his early phase tho no raid frames and lot of otherthings still need a tweak like my buffs and such if i would emblem this as a version it would be v0.2b so ye dont judge to hard :banana:

Quote:

Originally Posted by zork (Post 304837)

I'm still using my Diablo UI.

I had intentions in the last weeks to get back to a stripped down UI. Basically just simple font. Simple statusbars and a small backdrop shadow.
http://imgur.com/7wTiUIh

Experimenting with a pixelated UI would be interesting aswell.

I'm not raiding any more so...

Those party frames? What texture is that? And do you mind sharing?! :D

Here is mine.

It is a working progress while I am studying OUF framework to make my layout.

I have tried Phanx, p3lim and others and now I am using Skaarj which is working so great that I have lost will to build mine :-)

Btw here is the interface of my little mage vs training dummy ... the usual epic fail :-)

Addons:

Most of the interface is WTF free with a lot of Zork addons:

- rActionBarStyler
- rActionButtonStyler
- rBuffFrameStyler
- rChat
- rFilter3
- rMinimap
- rPlayerPowerBarAlt
- rTooltip
- rVignette

just a little bit customized to share the same textures and fonts (removing the ugly outline effects from everywhere :) I hope zork don't read it :-)

- tullaCC
- tullaRange

- InfinityPlate
- Xloot
- Bugger
- Gofish

- Bazooka

- Some addons of mine, like HideToolTip and others (only to demo that someone uses them :-)
- Others here and there :-)

A special mention to a couple of addons I use since so long time :

- SimpleSelfRebuff
- LitePanels

SimpleSelfRebuff is so usefull.

LitePanels is the addon that make the background around zork's rActionBarStyler and it has this layout based on the fact you show (from blizzard menu) 2 or 3 rows of action bars.

Lua Code:

lpanels:CreateLayout("Back3r", {
{   name = "P1", anchor_to = "BOTTOM", x_off = 0, y_off = 2,
    bg_alpha = 0.7, width = 420, height = 108,
    border = "SOLID", border_color = "CLASS",
},
 
} )
 
 
lpanels:CreateLayout("Back2r", {
{   name = "P1", anchor_to = "BOTTOM", x_off = 0, y_off = 2,
    bg_alpha = 0.7, width = 420, height = 76,
    border = "SOLID", border_color = "CLASS",
},
 
} )
 
 
if MultiBarBottomRight:IsShown() == true or MultiBarBottomRight:IsVisible() == true then    
        
        lpanels:ApplyLayout(nil, "Back3r")
    
    else
        
        lpanels:ApplyLayout(nil, "Back2r")
end
 
 
-- lpanels:ApplyLayout("n:axilea", "Back3r")

Ehm the above code, after a better check don't seems to works so good so the best thing for me now is to add the name of pg in the statements:

lpanels:ApplyLayout("n:frostanzo", "Back2r")

and removing the if conditions. I really don't know why ... but I am investigating :-)

EDIT:
I have found the problem, but ... I'll post an help request in XML/LUA Help forum searching for some clues/tips because I don't know how to fix (if possible) it :-)